<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I DISAGREE WITH RUSH LIMBAUGH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://MaverickVoice.com/2010/02/12/i-disagree-with-rush-limbaugh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://MaverickVoice.com/2010/02/12/i-disagree-with-rush-limbaugh/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Dozens of Readers may be RIGHT!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Edwin Perry</title>
		<link>http://MaverickVoice.com/2010/02/12/i-disagree-with-rush-limbaugh/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Edwin Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MaverickVoice.com/?p=257#comment-47</guid>
		<description>You are correct: it is not uncommon, which is yet another grievous abuse of position, in my humble opinion, as the Executive Branch has no Legislative Power. That said, even if he were to draft a &quot;suggestion,&quot; it would still require the sponsorship of Harry, or Nancy, or Barney, or whoever he could get to sponsor the bill. That sponsorship would also put ownership of that bill in the hands of that representative. It would be the &quot;Pelosi&quot; Bill or the &quot;Reid&quot; Bill, not the &quot;Obama&quot; Bill, and that&#039;s my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct: it is not uncommon, which is yet another grievous abuse of position, in my humble opinion, as the Executive Branch has no Legislative Power. That said, even if he were to draft a &#8220;suggestion,&#8221; it would still require the sponsorship of Harry, or Nancy, or Barney, or whoever he could get to sponsor the bill. That sponsorship would also put ownership of that bill in the hands of that representative. It would be the &#8220;Pelosi&#8221; Bill or the &#8220;Reid&#8221; Bill, not the &#8220;Obama&#8221; Bill, and that&#8217;s my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hansen</title>
		<link>http://MaverickVoice.com/2010/02/12/i-disagree-with-rush-limbaugh/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MaverickVoice.com/?p=257#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to disagree on one point here, Todd... It&#039;s not at all uncommon for a President to provide &quot;prewritten&quot; legislation to Congress for introduction... If President Obama felt strongly about specific policy, he could very easily have it drafted, exactly the way he wanted it, and send it to Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi, or any of his supporters in Congress to be introduced...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to disagree on one point here, Todd&#8230; It&#8217;s not at all uncommon for a President to provide &#8220;prewritten&#8221; legislation to Congress for introduction&#8230; If President Obama felt strongly about specific policy, he could very easily have it drafted, exactly the way he wanted it, and send it to Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi, or any of his supporters in Congress to be introduced&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

